atelier V celebrates the grand opening of Baker Street Village Phase I

Westwood, California

URBAN RENEWAL THROUGH AFFORDABILITY IN OLD TOWN KERN

On Wednesday November 2, 2011 atelier V celebrated the grand opening of Baker Street Village Phase I in Bakersfield, California. Attending the ceremonies were dignitaries from the City government including but not limited to Honorable Harvey Hall, the Mayor of Bakersfield, Messieurs Stephen Pelz, Executive Director, and Randy Coats Deputy Director of Planning for Kern County Housing Authority as well as Ms. Donna Kunz, the Redevelopment Agency Director for the City of Bakersfield.

Baker Street Village is a true mixed use master plan community that originally started as a Public-Private partnership between a private developer and the City of Bakersfield’s Redevelopment Agency back in 2007.  The 2008 financial crises took its toll on the project and rendered it economically unfeasible as a private development.  Fortunately,  in early 2010 the Housing Authority of the County of Kern came to the rescue and purchased the project with the new mission of transforming it into Affordable Housing.  Atelier V and the Housing Authority went through a series of cost-cutting value engineering iterations to achieve the new budget objective.  The re-designed began construction in the fall of 2010 and was completed  October of this year.

Baker Street Village is a multi-phase mixed use project. Phase I  is comprised of two distinct housing prototypes.  First (Building A) are a series of twenty four 3-story 3-bedroom townhome units in 4 separate buildings totaling approximately 62,000 sf.  The second part (Building B) of the complex is a 3-story 27,000 sf mixed use building with 13 one-bedroom loft-type units and 10,000 sf of retail on the ground floor along Baker Street. The complex’s various components are connected via pedestrian walkways enhancing the urban character of the project.  The townhome units are designed as walk-ups with the main level approximately 4 feet higher than the pedestrian sidewalk, while the garages are half sunken below grade and accessed from the back side.  Again, the idea was to enhance the pedestrian experience on Lake and King avenues with the structures hugging the property line. The townhome facades are a combination of wood siding and cement plaster with painted wood trims.  The mixed use building (Bldg. B) along Baker street takes on a completely different look while staying true to the urban nature of the project.  Large expanses of glass and corrugated metal panels in combination with cement plaster  add to create the setting for a more sophisticated urban lifestyle.  “We worked closely with the County of Kern Housing Authority officials to try and preserve as much of the original features of the project as possible while meeting new and completely re-defined objectives” Said Mark Vaghei, AIA Principal in Charge of atelier V: architecture (www.atelierv.com)

atelier V looks forward to the implementation of Phase II of Baker Street Village which promises to fill in the missing pieces in the overall strategy of Urban Renewal of Old Downtown Kern.

atelier V: architecture would like to thank Messieurs Stephen Pelz, Randy Coats and Mike Ruiz of the County of Kern Housing Authority for their invaluable efforts to resurrect the project.  We also like to thank Wallace and Smith, the General Contractor and their personnel, Tom McCormick, Ed Felicidario and Ulysses Edralin for all their hard work to build the project.

For more information and photos on this and other atelier V projects, please visit : www.atelierv.com projects/residential/Baker Street Village Phase I (Copyrighted 2011, atelier V, Inc.)

Credits:

atelier V team:  Vanessa Ablegas, Project Manager, Alistair Turner, 3D artist

Structural Engineer :  APSG Engineers , Mr. Avtar Pall, Principal

Civil Engineer :  Porter-Robertson Engineering and Surveying, Inc,  Mr. Matt Carson, Project Manager


The Birth of a City

Putting Down Roots in a Refugee Camp

Photo Gallery: A New African City
The Dadaab refugee camp in Kenya is the world’s largest. The machinery of international famine relief is in full gear there, but hundreds of thousands of people may become long-term residents. Conditions have prompted a camp manager to transform a temporary refuge into a city of the future.

This morning the Somali refugees are trying, again, to bury a child in his new city. Henok Ochalla sees them digging up red earth with their hatchets. He stops his SUV, plods over to the parents and tells them this camp is a place for life, not a cemetery.

Life here admittedly drags on in filthy conditions, in hot tents surrounded by prickly shrubs cluttered with black plastic bags. But it could become a more nourishing life.

“You have to bury your child someplace else,” Ochalla says.

Less than an hour later he drives past the improvised gravesite again and nods with satisfaction. “They understood,” he says. The family has removed the small body and taken it to the place where a new sign reads “Graveyard.” Children are still dying in the camp from the effects of malnutrition, pneumonia and infection. “They are digging everywhere,” says Ochalla. “I can’t allow that. Order is critical here now.”

Ochalla is a powerful-looking man, a 39-year-old Ethiopian with a big, white smile, a smile that reassures people in Dadaab — otherwise a hellish, chaotic place.

Kenya’s Newest City

Ochalla works for the United Nations. He is one of the five camp managers, a sort of humanitarian mayor, in the world’s largest refugee camp, located on the Somali border in Kenya. He’s also a builder, a logistician and a registration office. His job is to find places to live for the thousands of refugees that have stubmled across the border every day for months now, their feet sore, their stomachs empty and their heads full of expectations. He allocates plots and makes arrangements to provide them with water, latrines, tents and addresses.

In fact, Ochalla is in the process of building a new city. It will be called “Ifo Extension” — a new wing of the twenty-year-old UN facility known as the Ifo Refugee Camp, outside the town of Dadaab. The new extension will be the size of the German city of Tübingen, about 90,000 people, and it will come complete with schools, market squares and police stations.

Ochalla wants to build a real city, a more tolerable place than the camp is today, and a place “made for the future.” He needs to provide a home for 90,000 refugees by December. Once emergency conditions are over, he hopes that stone houses will stand where there are tents today. A dust cloud engulfs Ochalla’s UN vehicle and a group of thin children, who stare as if it were a spaceship that had landed on their dried-up planet.

His two mobile phones, an iPhone and a Nokia, ring constantly. “It’s not going fast enough with the water tanks,” he says into one of the phones. “We need four more tents in section S today,” he says into the other. He wears suede shoes and a safari hat. Three tents were stolen during the night, he says.

Ochalla and his colleagues from the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR), the World Food Program and the other aid organizations working in Dadaab need to come up with quick answers to the questions posed by refugees and politicians, or by donors, like a German family that gives €50 of its monthly budget to the camp. Questions like: How does the world’s largest refugee camp, a place with 450,000 residents, function?

And how does one bring structure to a place where the life of each individual is in a state of almost complete chaos, where people have no homes, no food and no plan for the future? Aside from giving them a few sacks of flour every month, is it possible to give these people a future?

Africa is the continent of human suffering, but it is also a place where people are constantly in flux, constantly trying to make its 30 million square kilometers (11.6 million square miles) more habitable. It has the African Union, which seeks “African solutions for African problems.” And it has Jeffrey Sachs and the UN Millennium Project, Bill Gates and his attempt to develop genetically modified plants to fight hunger, Bob Geldof, Bono, Angelina Jolie and all the other celebrities who have turned Africa into a canvas for their humanitarian efforts. Finally, it has Henok Ochalla of the UNHCR, who sets out every morning and tries to bring a little order and hope to this new wave of suffering.

‘I Can’t Count Them All’

But can anyone give hope to people like Nuriya Ali, a woman who fled the worst drought in a decade and arrived in Dadaab with nothing but her four daughters? It’s 6:30 a.m., and the sun is still pale in the sky above the reception center in the Ifo Extension, when Nuriya Ali and her daughters reach Dadaab, after walking for 10 days through the arid Somali steppe and wandering around the camps for two days and two nights. Nuriya is waiting to be granted entry into the world’s largest city of hungry people.

She presses her hand against her breast and squats on the ground in front of the gate, trying to nurse her four-month-old baby girl. Nuriya’s breast milk stopped flowing several days ago. Now the baby just lies there, lacking even the strength to cry. Her three other children — Sowdo, 7, Maryan, 5 and Amina, 3 — cling to her veil. The girls haven’t eaten in three days. They don’t speak, play or laugh. They simply stare into space. Hunger has made them apathetic.

Nuriya has a thoughtful look in her eyes and the smooth skin of a young girl. She is from Afmadow, a small city in southern Somalia, where the Shabab militias, armed with assault rifles, control everyday life. She believes she is 26. Her husband died of a snakebite when she was pregnant. He couldn’t be driven to the hospital because the family had no car. “Everything is gone, everything,” she says. “We don’t even have a plastic jug anymore.”

Nuriya Ali is a nomad. She remembers that her family once had 25 cows, but when the drought came they had to travel ever-greater distances to find even a small amount of water. Sometimes they would walk for two days before reaching water, and at other times there was no water to be found. First the animals died, and then the people started dying. “I can’t count them all,” says Nuriya, referring to the neighbors and friends who died. Those who were still able to flee left Somalia, and Nuriya joined the exodus.

Hunger threatens more than 12 million people in the Horn of Africa. Some 38 percent of the population is malnourished in southern Somalia. Thousands have already starved to death this year, and the death toll could continue to rise, possibly reaching several hundred thousand in the coming weeks. No one knows how many will flee to Dadaab, or how many more people the enormous refugee camp can still support.

Nuriya looks at the gate, where hundreds of other refugees sit or squat on the ground, including women with up to seven children and old people dragging themselves along on sticks. An entire village has gathered under a single tarpaulin.

They’re all waiting to be ushered into this gigantic aid machine, where people are processed into computer files and sorted by health status and family size, and where tons of relief supplies and tents have been purchased with the money the aid organizations have raised.

In recent weeks, $251 million (€178 million) have been donated for drought victims in the Horn of Africa, including $21 million from the German government. Once again, the money is far from sufficient to meet the refugees’ needs.

Somalia suffers from the double curse of drought and war. The situation has worsened in the twenty years since the nation’s central government collapsed. And now international speculators, betting on agricultural commodities markets, have driven up prices and forced people like Nuriya to leave their homes. The West gives millions of dollar every year; but the West also takes. Dadaab and its residents are a microcosm of Africa, a place full of people forced by war, global markets and drought into a life that could not exist without the global aid machine.

Read the entire article at :

http://archinect.com/navigate/20560299/http%253A%252F%252Fwww.spiegel.de%252Finternational%252Fspiegel%252F0%25252c1518%25252c784682%25252c00.html%2523ref%25253dnlint

Better Living Through Architecture

Vacation Homes for a New Britain

By Katja Thimm in London

Photo Gallery: Alain de Botton's Holiday Homes
Philosopher and bestselling author Alain de Botton wants to improve the lives of the British population and teach them to appreciate modern architecture. He is hoping to transform society with a series of avant-garde vacation homes designed by top architects.
The streets around Belsize Park underground station in London are lined with stores selling organic food and wooden toys. Local children have names like Peach or Petal Blossom Rainbow.
The residents of the Victorian houses behind rose-filled front gardens are Oscar-winners, star chefs and pop musicians, happy-go-lucky bohemians for whom success is a given. And right in their midst lives a pale man with a receding hairline who spends his time thinking and writing — and planning how to re-educate the British population.
Alain de Botton wants to revolutionize Britain’s long-held tastes in housing, design and architecture, and thus change the entire outlook of people in this rather traditionally-minded country. Yet de Botton is a philosopher, not a rebel, and his British accent sounds like what used to be called BBC English. When he spoke to SPIEGEL, he was wearing neat, dark-blue trousers, and his tone of voice was polite and quiet. He says he is shy, sometimes almost reclusive. Having spent his childhood in Switzerland as the son of a banker before attending prestigious Cambridge University in England, 41-year-old De Botton was certainly not destined to deal merely with everyday life. And yet he is fascinated by the humdrum, its raw baseness, and it, in turn, has provided him with insight, wealth and fame. De Botton’s books have titles like “The Art of Travel” and “The Consolations of Philosophy.” His ability to express profound concepts in a simple way has made him a millionaire. As such, the philosopher of everyday life could easily sit back and enjoy a bohemian existence.

Clear, Light Architecture Leads to a Good Life

Yet he still ponders and writes and hatches plans. “I feel I have a real mission,” he says. “At the same time, it’s actually the most banal thing in the world: building and letting holiday homes.” De Botton knows that what he is doing isn’t banal. He has simply asked contemporary architects for designs for a series of modern dwellings. “In this country, you mainly encounter modern architecture in airports and museums,” he says. “But clear, light architecture can help people lead a good life.” De Botton is constantly searching for the conditions for successful existence. It’s a very atypical, proactive approach for a thinker. Yes, he also suffers from the same existential plight as any other true philosopher, and he’s no stranger to sleepless nights, headaches and monosyllabic bad moods. But now and then de Botton decides enough is enough. When that happens, he stops thinking and faces the world, ready to change it if need be. Philosophers can be a strange sight in real life. They can seem out of place, odd, smug even. But the pale man with the receding hairline has always found an audience.

A School of Life

Once, in the summer of 2009, he temporarily moved into London’s massive Heathrow Airport, where he sat at a desk amid travelers, exchanged fleeting words with busy voyagers, discussed the concepts of time and space and being home and away from home with waiting passengers. He then wrote down what he discovered, and soon another volume of his insights hit the bookshelves. De Botton also set up his so-called School of Life in the very heart of society in a store near a barber shop, the British Museum and an Asian take-out restaurant. There, he taught adults how to protect their love or make meaningful table-talk: “Try to avoid the banalities which can become second nature in personal interactions.” It may be somewhat pretentious to offer adults so much education, but Alain de Botton knows he is providing a public service. He just wants to help modern individuals who may have the means to confidently jet around the globe, but who are on the wrong track when it comes to their own lives. De Botton chose a quotation from Anton Chekhov as the motto of his School of Life: “Any idiot can face a crisis — it is this day-to-day living that wears you out.” You’re unlikely to find a man like de Botton — who wants to change everyday life with actions rather than words — in Germany, where philosophy is synonymous with gravity and gloom, irreconcilable moral conflicts, an ultra-complex dialectical history and lonely reflection. Nor will you find someone like him in France, even though philosophers there typically have their say on current affairs, advise politicians and regularly appear on talk shows. France has men like Bernard-Henri Lévy, who instructs presidents and has a large following. In his latest project, de Botton wants to create a series of designer holiday homes that Britons can stay in for as little as 20 pounds ($33 or €23) per person per night. That’s cost price, so he won’t be making any profit on it, but de Botton’s idea is about more important things than money. He’s convinced that giving people a vacation in avant-garde surroundings will teach them about the wonders of modern design. After all, he says, people are more relaxed and open to new ideas when they’re on holiday. De Botton is well aware he’s set himself an ambitious task. That’s why he uses appropriately grandiose words when talking about his venture. “We are fighting a culture war,” he says. “The UK is obsessed with the past. From an architectural standpoint, Prince Charles rules the land.” He grimaces as he utters these words, although he rarely permits himself such grotesque facial expressions. The heir to the British throne has famously dismissed modern buildings as “monstrous carbuncles,” and refuses to give much credence even to world-famous British architects like Norman Foster. ….Continued..

Are Architects Performance Artists?

A Conference Addresses ‘Performativity’

By Jonathan Liu 7/12 

 “We understand more than anyone else on the job site,” Gregg Pasquarelli told a second-floor conference room one recent Thursday evening inside the New School’s Arnhold Hall. His audience peered at him through a remarkable selection of eyewear—surely the most impressive array of cantilevers, arches and trusswork west of the East River. “We truly do,” he reiterated. “We know more than the developer, we know more the contractor, we know more than the inspector, we know more than the guy installing something. We know a lot about all the stuff. It’s the integrator and the communicator role that’s the most important thing: We don’t build buildings, we make instruction sets for buildings.” At a time when even flat-box furniture is morphed by amateurs into “Ikeahacks,” has our civilization forgotten how to properly follow instructions—and defer to instruction-makers? A principal of SHoP Architects, the burgeoning firm at work on Barclays Center and the South Street Seaport redevelopment, Mr. Pasquarelli was the keynote speaker at the Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture’s Teachers Seminar 2011. The theme of this year’s three-day conference was “Performative Practices,” which begs a bit of clarification. Borrowed from linguistics, by way of sociology, ethnography and much else besides, “performance” is perhaps better known as one of those terms of academic art whose very amorphousness—to the uncharitable, meaninglessness—is the intellectual and political point. And in a way, the advent of architecture-as-performance did free thinking from the entrenched, and perhaps as meaningless, rivalry between the formalist and functionalist. Is the “performer” in question the architect, the inhabitant, or the building itself? Yes. Like many coinages of the 1960s, performativity is an ideal that seems just as free-associational nowadays—but that’s been astutely monetized, or should be. In Mr. Pasquarelli’s telling, architects must assert their parochial interests as “the last great generalist profession.” “It’s about grabbing those territories back that have systematically been given away by our profession over the past 30 years,” he said at the conference. “For us, that is the core of performance-based design. Think about what the buildings do, how they work, how they’re put together. What are the politics behind it? What’s the finance behind it? What’s the technology behind it? How’s it going to engage a city?” Mr. Pasquarelli’s favorite slide was a quasi-Venn diagram, without the productive overlaps: architects deal with clients and general contractors as would-be advisories, while outsourcing details—facades, fabrication, zoning, finance—to an orbit of specialist consultants. SHoP’s solution has been rear-guard vertical integration, morphing over 15 years from a five-person design firm to a boutique conglomerate with hands in planning, construction, software, and even real estate itself. (Developers are apparently apt to listen to architects that take equity stakes in their condo projects.) Above all, SHoP is concerned with materials. “I’m not talking about sitting down with your mechanical engineer, early in a project,” Mr. Pasquarelli said. “I mean actually, like, actually talking to the tinknocker who’s bending metal when you’re building a building and finding out how big are the sheets are that can fit on a truck, and what the turning radiuses are, what are the eight ways they can be clipped together.” SHoP Construction is managing the fabrication of the Barclays Center’s rust-steel skin, cut from digital files, weathered in an Indianapolis warehouse, and tagged by barcode; SHoP Applications has unleashed an iPhone app so that “everyone from Bruce Ratner to the guy turning the screwdriver” can track the status of each of thousands of unique panels. A drumbeat of opportunity—or countdown of crisis—animated much of the ACSA seminar. “We are out ahead of the construction industry by about three or four years,” Mr. Pasquiarelli told the room. “But if we don’t grab those territories really fast, they’re going to grab them first and we’re going to get even more relegated to the sidelines.” SHoP, he insisted, was to remain “firmly rooted in the academic,” despite the branded subsidiaries, commitment to large-scale building, and general interest in making money. This wasn’t just playing to the bookish crowd. Performance theory in the 20th century exploded architecture into the realm of the phenomenological, the discursive, the dramaturgical. Performative practices in the 21st seems to be about architects realigning themselves with the ancient and decidedly un-theatrical realities of engineering—while maintaining the self-dramatizing ideas (and language) of “capital-A Architecture.” This language, of an exceptional tradition losing its “territory,” betrayed real professional pride tempered by severe vocational anxiety. Might architects really be at risk of irrelevance? In a mildly controversial article this April, Slate critic Witold Rybczynski took to task the sort of dense, insular architecture speak—“assemblage,” “tectonic,” “spatiality”—favored by, say, participants at ACSA conferences. (Sample presentations at the New School event: “The Architectural Detail in Inter/Trans-disciplinary Practice,” “Historical Problematics of the Collaborative Divide.”) Nineteenth-century architects, claimed Mr. Rybczynski, invented all……

Read Entire article at : http://archinect.com/navigate/13144203/http%253A%252F%252Fwww.observer.com%252F2011%252F07%252Fare-architects-performance-artists-a-conference-addresses-performativity%252F

atelier V Modern in Beverly Wood

Westwood, California

atelier V completes the design of Duxbury Residence in Beverly Wood, California. Sustainable Total Architecture in the heart of Los Angeles.

atelier V: architecture (www.atelierv.com) has  completed the design of Duxbury Residence. A 9,000 sf , 2-story + basement single family home nestled in a quiet tree-lined street in the wonderful community of Beverly Wood in the heart of Los Angeles.  The new house will replace an existing single story 1950′s structure.  The Owners are a couple from New York who moved to the community many years ago and subsequently moved to a bigger home in Beverly Hills.  As proud grandparents, recently they made a decision to move back to the Beverly Wood community to be closer to their daughters and their grandchildren.  “The client wanted a modern home while satisfying their need for big family gatherings during the  holidays and room for grandchildren to play and feel at home”  says Mark Vaghei, AIA, atelier V’s Principal.  Given the Los Angeles Mansionization Ordinance in effect, the area of the home could not exceed a maximum 45% of the lot area.  One way to increase the available usable area to the client was to introduce a full basement floor. Additionally, the mansionization Ordinance allowed a maximum height of 33 feet with a 25% sloped roof which further narrowed down the alternative envelope of the house.  “We approached the program very logically by introducing a tripartite plan parti, effectively separating the home into 3 different zones, with the entry/gallery space in the middle housing all vertical circulation, the public zone,  and the private zones on each side” says , Mark Vaghei.  The second floor of the house is similarly divided into a master suite and other bedrooms connected via a bridge through the middle double height gallery space.  An elevator serves both the first and second floors as well as the basement, providing easy access from the garage at the basement level to the kitchen and the bedrooms.  The middle zone in the plan extends outside both on the entry/street side as well as the back yard and manifests itself in the ground plan in the form of water.  Pool on the one side,  and a cascading water feature on the other pulling your eye in both directions through the light-filled glass- enclosed galley space.  Additionally, the gallery opens down to the basement partially to let natural light penetrate deep into the basement floor making that floor an integral part of the house.

The roof is what really distinguishes this home from any other home in the neighborhood and for that matter the entire LA area.  The metal clad roofs are gently undulating waves in opposite direction on the two outer volumes of the structure flanking the skylit gallery in the middle.  The roofs will be covered with solar tiles essentially freeing the structure from the need for conventional energy sources.  Operable skylights in the middle gallery space will vent warm air from throughout the house and glass exposure to the south and south-west provide for maximum passive solar energy. 

The hardscape/landscape is divided into zones of activity.  Flat grass areas around the pool for the grandchildren to play, outdoor living room with a fireplace off the kitchen for informal gatherings, a hardscaped area flanking the pool for lounging , barbequing and larger gatherings.  On the front yard side, the elevation difference between the entry and the sidewalk is mitigated through a series of “landscaped Shelves” transitioning down to the sidewalk and flanking the cascaded water feature.  The side yards are reserved for the Client’s favorite trees effectively providing barrier for privacy.  “The result is really what we call Total Architecture, a type of structure which is in total harmony with its ground plane/site and grows out of it and not merely planted on it” Says Mark Vaghei, AIA

Duxbury Residence will go through the Beverly Wood Association for final approvals and is planned for construction sometimes in 2012.  For more information on this project including plans and models and other work by atelier V please go to : www.atelierv.com to Projects to Residential to Duxbury Residence.

Credits: Elise McCurley (3D artist), atelier V

Across Europe, Irking Drivers Is Urban Policy

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/27/science/earth/27traffic.html?pagewanted=1&_r=2&hp

Pedestrians and trams are given priority treatment in Zurich. Tram operators can turn traffic lights in their favor as they approach, forcing cars to halt.

By ELISABETH ROSENTHAL

Published: June 26, 2011 

 While American cities are synchronizing green lights to improve traffic flow and offering apps to help drivers find parking, many European cities are doing the opposite: creating environments openly hostile to cars. The methods vary, but the mission is clear — to make car use expensive and just plain miserable enough to tilt drivers toward more environmentally friendly modes of transportation. Multimedia Slide Show Europe’s Fight Against Traffic.  Cities including Vienna to Munich and Copenhagen have closed vast swaths of streets to car traffic. Barcelona and Paris have had car lanes eroded by popular bike-sharing programs. Drivers in London and Stockholm pay hefty congestion charges just for entering the heart of the city. And over the past two years, dozens of German cities have joined a national network of “environmental zones” where only cars with low carbon dioxide emissions may enter. Likeminded cities welcome new shopping malls and apartment buildings but severely restrict the allowable number of parking spaces.

On-street parking is vanishing. In recent years, even former car capitals like Munich have evolved into “walkers’ paradises,” said Lee Schipper, a senior research engineer at Stanford University who specializes in sustainable transportation. “In the United States, there has been much more of a tendency to adapt cities to accommodate driving,” said Peder Jensen, head of the Energy and Transport Group at the European Environment Agency. “Here there has been more movement to make cities more livable for people, to get cities relatively free of cars.” To that end, the municipal Traffic Planning Department here in Zurich has been working overtime in recent years to torment drivers. Closely spaced red lights have been added on roads into town, causing delays and angst for commuters. Pedestrian underpasses that once allowed traffic to flow freely across major intersections have been removed. Operators in the city’s ever expanding tram system can turn traffic lights in their favor as they approach, forcing cars to halt. Around Löwenplatz, one of Zurich’s busiest squares, cars are now banned on many blocks. Where permitted, their speed is limited to a snail’s pace so that crosswalks and crossing signs can be removed entirely, giving people on foot the right to cross anywhere they like at any time. As he stood watching a few cars inch through a mass of bicycles and pedestrians, the city’s chief traffic planner, Andy Fellmann, smiled. “Driving is a stop-and-go experience,” he said. “That’s what we like! Our goal is to reconquer public space for pedestrians, not to make it easy for drivers.” While some American cities — notably San Francisco, which has “pedestrianized” parts of Market Street — have made similar efforts, they are still the exception in the United States, where it has been difficult to get people to imagine a life where cars are not entrenched, Dr. Schipper said. Europe’s cities generally have stronger incentives to act. Built for the most part before the advent of cars, their narrow roads are poor at handling heavy traffic. Public transportation is generally better in Europe than in the United States, and gas often costs over $8 a gallon, contributing to driving costs that are two to three times greater per mile than in the United States, Dr. Schipper said. What is more, European Union countries probably cannot meet a commitment under the Kyoto Protocol to reduce their carbon dioxide emissions unless they curb driving. The United States never ratified that pact. Globally, emissions from transportation continue a relentless rise, with half of them coming from personal cars. Yet an important impulse behind Europe’s traffic reforms will be familiar to mayors in Los Angeles and Vienna alike: to make cities more inviting, with cleaner air and less traffic. Michael Kodransky, global research manager at the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy in New York, which works with cities to reduce transport emissions, said that Europe was previously “on the same trajectory as the United States, with more people wanting to own more cars.” But in the past decade, there had been “a conscious shift in thinking, and firm policy,” he said. And it is having an effect. After two decades of car ownership, Hans Von Matt, 52, who works in the insurance industry, sold his vehicle and now gets around Zurich by tram or bicycle, using a car-sharing service for trips out of the city. Carless households have increased from 40 to 45 percent in the last decade, and car owners use their vehicles less, city statistics show.

“There were big fights over whether to close this road or not — but now it is closed, and people got used to it,” he said, alighting from his bicycle on Limmatquai, a riverside pedestrian zone lined with cafes that used to be two lanes of gridlock. Each major road closing has to be approved in a referendum.

Today 91 percent of the delegates to the Swiss Parliament take the tram to work.

Still, there is grumbling. “There are all these zones where you can only drive 20 or 30 kilometers per hour [about 12 to 18 miles an hour], which is rather stressful,” Thomas Rickli, a consultant, said as he parked his Jaguar in a lot at the edge of town. “It’s useless.”

Urban planners generally agree that a rise in car commuting is not desirable for cities anywhere.

Mr. Fellmann calculated that a person using a car took up 115 cubic meters (roughly 4,000 cubic feet) of urban space in Zurich while a pedestrian took three. “So it’s not really fair to everyone else if you take the car,” he said.

European cities also realized they could not meet increasingly strict World Health Organization guidelines for fine-particulate air pollution if cars continued to reign. Many American cities are likewise in “nonattainment” of their Clean Air Act requirements, but that fact “is just accepted here,” said Mr. Kodransky of the New York-based transportation institute.

It often takes extreme measures to get people out of their cars, and providing good public transportation is a crucial first step. One novel strategy in Europe is intentionally making it harder and more costly to park. “Parking is everywhere in the United States, but it’s disappearing from the urban space in Europe,” said Mr. Kodransky, whose recent report “Europe’s Parking U-Turn” surveys the shift.

Sihl City, a new Zurich mall, is three times the size of Brooklyn’s Atlantic Mall but has only half the number of parking spaces, and as a result, 70 percent of visitors get there by public transport, Mr. Kodransky said.

In Copenhagen, Mr. Jensen, at the European Environment Agency, said that his office building had more than 150 spaces for bicycles and only one for a car, to accommodate a disabled person.

While many building codes in Europe cap the number of parking spaces in new buildings to discourage car ownership, American codes conversely tend to stipulate a minimum number. New apartment complexes built along the light rail line in Denver devote their bottom eight floors to parking, making it “too easy” to get in the car rather than take advantage of rail transit, Mr. Kodransky said.

While Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg has generated controversy in New York by “pedestrianizing” a few areas like Times Square, many European cities have already closed vast areas to car traffic. Store owners in Zurich had worried that the closings would mean a drop in business, but that fear has proved unfounded, Mr. Fellmann said, because pedestrian traffic increased 30 to 40 percent where cars were banned.

 With politicians and most citizens still largely behind them, Zurich’s planners continue their traffic-taming quest, shortening the green-light periods and lengthening the red with the goal that pedestrians wait no more than 20 seconds to cross.“We would never synchronize green lights for cars with our philosophy,” said Pio Marzolini, a city official. “When I’m in other cities, I feel like I’m always waiting to cross a street. I can’t get used to the idea that I am worth less than a car.”

Aesthetic Energy Autobahns

http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/0,1518,760465,00.html

Can Designer Power Masts Win Over the Public?

By Christina Schmidt

Photo Gallery: Designer Power Masts

Europe is undergoing a revolution in energy production that requires massive new infrastructure to support the shift to renewables. But do new power lines always have to result in blight? Some utility companies are hoping that designer power masts can help overcome local opposition. Erik Bystrup gets enthusiastic when the talk turns to power transmission masts. Standing in front of one of his masts, the Danish architect uses words like “elegance” and “beauty” and talks about how pleased he is that transmission masts are finally no longer dotting the landscape like “giant sad men.”

There is a simple reason behind Bystrup’s passionate words: His masts are not ordinary steel structures but art. To improve the Danes’ acceptance of the poles, which are visible at great distances, the architect designed modern masts that look like abstract crowns or eagles’ wings.

 

Bystrup is proud that he can count himself among the pioneers of a new aesthetic of the power transmission mast. Some 500 of his winged masts will soon mark a 166-kilometer (103-mile) section of power lines in Denmark’s Jutland region. The architect rhapsodizes over the steel poles, saying the way they reflect sunlight will make them “almost invisible.”

Invisibility is a characteristic many citizens would like see applied to power lines. Because of the massive shift to renewable energies currently being planned, thousands of kilometers of new, high-voltage power lines will have to be installed throughout Europe in the coming years, a prospect that generates very little enthusiasm across the continent. The masts will be used to transport electricity from offshore windparks off the North and Baltic seas as well as saved energy from batteries in Norway in Northern Europe as well as power from giant solar energy facilities in North Africa to consumers across the continent. But the networks of steel cable, which are about 60 meters (197 feet) high, are a blight on the landscape and are surrounded by electromagnetic fields, triggering public campaigns against them in many European countries. In Germany, the public debate is beginning in earnest following plans by Chanceller Angela Merkel to back away from her government’s initial move to extend the lifelines of nuclear plants and to now likely retreat from atomic energy entirely.

Design against NIMBY Lawsuits

With a whole slew of not-in-my-backyard (NIMBY) lawsuits planned against the construction of so-called new energy autobahns in Germany and elsewhere in Europe, grid operators in many places are now deploying a new weapon in the fight against this concentrated resistance: the power of beauty. In the Finnish city of Jyväskylä, transmission masts are no longer just unadorned metal poles. Instead, yellow, looped Y-shaped masts stretch into the sky. When they are illuminated at night, they convey the message of green electricity. In Iceland, dramatic designs could lead to masts in the future that take the shape of human statues. Because of the way they are designed, they can even be adjusted to suit their environment, so that, for example, they look like people climbing up a hill.

The electric utilities can already report their first successes. Bystrup’s crown-shaped masts in northern Denmark are the result of a contest the Danish grid operator Energinet.dk announced about 10 years ago. To gain approval for a new transmission route, the company enticed local residents and their political representatives with the idea of using less conspicuous designer masts. “Politicians took up the idea and then told us it was a requirement,” says Energinet.dk manager Christian Jensen. It was a horse trade that apparently brought reconciliation into the political debate. Today, local residents fondly refer to the transmission masts as “magic wands,” an allusion to their shape.

But it isn’t everywhere that citizens meekly succumb to the charm of the spruced up masts, which, at the end of the day, are still masts, as the Dutch grid operator Tennet experienced. Its proposal to replace the standard steel poles with double masts consisting of two asparagus-shaped poles encountered little approval. “We want underground lines instead of dangerous masts. A new exterior doesn’t change that,” says Harry van der Weij, one of the protesting citizens.

‘Our Projects Are Still in Their Infancy’

In other European countries, the conflict over power transmission masts as art is in full swing. In Germany, on the other hand, which likes to see itself as a pioneer of future-oriented energy technology, there are no masts shaped like asparagus, crowns or wings to be seen. “Our projects are still in their infancy,” says Wilfried Fischer, manager of major projects with the eastern German grid operator 50Hertz. The traditional grid-shaped mast is so superior in terms of solidity and economic efficiency, says Fischer, that the only word he can think of to describe them is “optimal.”

German bureaucracy, with its thousands of safety and construction rules, has also made it difficult to change the design of traditional masts. “Overhead power lines are in the public space. They are our responsibility, and we cannot experiment with untested materials,” says Fischer.

 

The planned surge of investment would provide an opportunity to design power lines to be as unobtrusive as possible. Designer masts are a compromise but by no means an answer to the question of how much harm the human need for electricity is actually worth. The grid operators still have other ways of satisfying local residents’ demands, such as by using the power grid of Deutsche Bahn, Germany’s national railway, installing underground power lines and even integrating wind turbines into power masts to generate additional electricity.

The Danish architect Bystrup knows from firsthand experience how great the need for discussion is. During the course of the public debate, he was forced to redesign his eagle-wing mast several times. First it was safety concerns and residents’ demands that the masts be placed farther away from homes, and then visual preferences, that made the masts slimmer, but also taller and more noticeable. The architect was left with little of his original vision to create an invisible mast.

Squatting in the Sky

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/01/world/americas/01venezuela.html?_r=1

A 45-Story Walkup Beckons the Desperate

Meridith Kohut for The New York Times

 The “Tower of David,” a 45-story uncompleted skyscraper located in downtown Caracas, Venezuela, is one of Latin America’s tallest skyscrapers. It is also home to more than 2,500 squatters.

By SIMON ROMERO and MARÍA EUGENIA DÍAZ

CARACAS, Venezuela — Architects still call the 45-story skyscraper the Tower of David, after David Brillembourg, the brash financier who built it in the 1990s. The helicopter landing pad on its roof remains intact, a reminder of the airborne limousines that were once supposed to drop bankers off for work. Multimedia Squatters on the Skyline Squatters on the SkylineClose VideoSee More Videos » .Enlarge This Image Meridith Kohut for The New York Times A woman looks out of a crudely constructed cinder block balcony on an upper floor of the “Tower of David.” Squatters live in the bottom 28 floors of the 45-story, uncompleted skyscraper, located in downtown Caracas. The office tower, one of Latin America’s tallest skyscrapers, was meant to be an emblem of Venezuela’s entrepreneurial mettle. But that era is gone. Now, with more than 2,500 squatters making it their home, the building symbolizes something else entirely in this city’s center. The squatters live in the uncompleted high-rise, which lacks several basic amenities like an elevator. The smell of untreated sewage permeates the corridors. Children scale unlit stairways guided by the glow of cellphones. Some recent arrivals sleep in tents and hammocks. The skyscraper, surrounded by billboards and murals proclaiming the advance of President Hugo Chávez’s “Bolivarian revolution,” is a symbol of the financial crisis that struck the country in the 1990s, the expanded state control over the economy that came after Mr. Chávez took office in 1999 and the housing shortage that has worsened since then, leading to widespread squatter takeovers in this city. Few of the building’s terraces have guardrails. Even walls and windows are absent on many floors. Yet dozens of DirecTV satellite dishes dot the balconies. The tower commands some of the most stunning views of Caracas. It contains some of its worst squalor. “I never let my child out of my sight,” said Yeaida Sosa, 29, who lives with her 1-year-old daughter, Dahasi, on the seventh floor overlooking a bustling artery, Avenida Andrés Bello. Ms. Sosa said residents were horrified after a young girl recently fell to her death from a high floor. Some families have walled off their terraces with cinder blocks, blotting out the sun to avoid such tragedies. Others, aware of the risks, prefer to let in the breeze flowing off El Ávila, the emerald green mountain looming over Caracas. “God decides when we enter his kingdom,” said Enrique Zambrano, 22, an electrician who lives on the 19th floor. Mr. Zambrano, like many of the other squatters in the skyscraper, says he is an evangelical Christian. Their pastor is Alexander Daza, 33, a former gang member who found religion in prison. Mr. Daza, commonly known as El Niño, or The Kid, led the occupation of the Tower of David in October 2007. Back then, the building had already been vacant for more than a decade. Its developer, Mr. Brillembourg, a dashing horse breeder, died of cancer at age 56 in 1993, leaving behind hobbled companies. The government absorbed their assets, including the unfinished skyscraper, during a 1994 banking crisis. Robert Neuwirth of New York, the author of “Shadow Cities,” a book about squatter settlements on four continents, said the Tower of David may be the world’s highest squatter building. Once one of Latin America’s most developed cities, Caracas now grapples with an acute housing shortage of about 400,000 units, breeding building invasions. In the area around the Tower of David, squatters have occupied 20 other properties, including the Viasa and Radio Continente towers. White elephants occupying the cityscape, like the Sambil shopping mall close to the Tower of David and seized by the government, now house flood victims. Private construction of housing here has virtually ground to a halt because of fears of government expropriation. The government, hobbled by inefficiency, has built little housing of its own for the poor. The policies toward squatters are also unclear and in flux, effectively allowing many to stay in once empty properties. On occasion, Mr. Chávez has called for squatters to be dislodged. But in January, he urged the poor to occupy unused land in well-heeled parts of Caracas. Then he qualified these remarks by asking them to have “patience” as officials tried to build low-income housing. Many here refuse to wait. The Tower of David stands as a parable of hope for some and of dread for others. “That building is a symbol of Venezuela’s decline,” said Benedicto Vera, 55, an activist in downtown Caracas. “What’s our future if our people are living like animals in unsafe skyscrapers?”

Read the entire article at : http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/01/world/americas/01venezuela.html?_r=1

atelier V completes design of El Oro Residence

Westwood, CA

Green architecture by the sea : 820 El Oro Lane

 atelier V : architecture (www.atelierv.com) has just completed the design for a new approximately 9,000 sf -3 level residence in the heart of Pacific Palisades, California.  The site of the new residence is a trapezoidal site of approximately 20,000 sf with flat pad area of about 7,000 sf and a frontage of nearly 220 feet with full on ocean and pearl necklace views.  Currently the site has a single story 1950′s structure on it which is to be demolished to make room for the new tri-level residence. 

Due to the site’s unique qualities and the available views as well as the client’s program, atelier V devised a strategy to minimize the movement of existing topography and work within as small a footprint as possible.  “We decided very early in our design process, that in fact the footprint of the existing structure was the best location on the site for the new house, so we expanded it minimally to allow for our new program as to not disturb the natural topography unnecessarily”, says Mark Vaghei AIA, atelier V’s Design Principal.   The goal of compacting the footprint, the desire to maximize the views which luckily were on a southern exposure, and the available frontage all resulted in a basically rectangular single-loaded very linear Parti .  The down slope of the site quickly resolved itself by placing the garage at the lower level , partially buried but still daylighting at one corner.  The rest of the program was housed in two levels above grade with an entirely transparent facade facing south-southeast to give every room maximum views.

The structure is designed to be  self-sufficient in its energy requirements for the most part.  This is achieved by using solar tile roofing on the entire span of the roof  while taking advantage of passive solar energy through careful orientation of the structure.  Use of recycled materials, engineered lumber, energy efficient appliances, water conserving fixtures etc. are all among the many features which make the structure surpass the CALGreen requirements.

The project is currently undergoing Coastal Commission approval process and is scheduled for construction in the early part of Calander yera 2012.  The preliminary cost figures are in the range of $335/sf which are expected to remain the same.  Primary materials for the project are VM Zinc. cladding, Cement plaster, Aluminium window systems, Painted steel structure and wood decking.

To see more detailed photographs of the design for the El Oro Residence please go to atelier V web site at : www.atelierv.com , projects/residential/El Oro Residence

Credits :

Atelier V team: Vanessa Ablegas, Project Manager, Alistair Turner, 3D Artist

Structural Engineering : APSG Engineers, Inc.

MEP Engineer : Shamim Engineering Inc.

 
 

 

The Bright Side of Blight

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/25/opinion/25lind.html?_r=2

 

By DIANA LIND

 

EVEN in Philadelphia, with its 40,000 vacant properties and a quarter of its population living below the poverty line, the Kensington neighborhood still shocks. On a frigid afternoon, a prostitute lingers in the shadow of the elevated train tracks, waiting restlessly for customers. Husks of long-closed factories stand amid thigh-high winter wheat. Streams of garbage flow down the streets, as if both the people and the city government had agreed to forsake the effort of propriety.

 In recent months, this neighborhood has also been terrorized by a killer who choked and raped his victims in the area’s ubiquitous abandoned houses and vacant lots. If only these deserted places could be charged as accomplices to the so-called Kensington Strangler’s three murders and two sexual assaults, and for aiding and abetting the drug use and prostitution that have caused so many of the neighborhood’s problems. But the empty lots with their discarded furniture and ghetto kudzu and the weather-beaten houses with boarded-up windows won’t be going anywhere soon.

 It’s been nearly 30 years since James Q. Wilson and George L. Kelling published their broken windows theory, positing that the torn social fabric that allows for vandalism also encourages other kinds of crime and disinvestment in a neighborhood. The theory validated the inclination to improve the built environment first, in the hopes that once a sense of confidence has been restored other aspects of an engaged community will follow. And in places on the cusp of gentrification or economic recovery, like certain New York areas in the ’90s, quality-of-life campaigns have been proven to clean up the streets and reduce crime.

 Indeed, as gentrification has slowly crept northward in Philadelphia, Kensington residents have gained some hope from a newly branded arts corridor, a few rejuvenated parks and street improvements, all thanks to the efforts of an invaluable local community development corporation. But this scattershot approach has failed to create the kind of holistic change needed in this neighborhood — or its counterparts in St. Louis, Cleveland, Detroit and Baltimore.

 Many cities have also sought to transform undeveloped lots into green space and urban agriculture. It’s a natural fit and, again, in Kensington a full city block has been converted from an industrial brownfield to an admirably active farm. But land-based strategies that try to reinvent this vacant lot or that blighted ground do little to stem the larger social trends that created the spatial problem in the first place.

 Philadelphia, like many Rust Belt cities, was so deeply hurt by the loss of manufacturing that began in the 1950s that it has yet to recover. Gone were the jobs that even high-school dropouts could leverage to achieve stable lives, and with them went the housing stock. Today, we are left with a city where the number of jobs requiring postsecondary education has grown, while more than 60 percent of Philadelphia’s adults read at a sixth grade level or below, creating a miserable mismatch that leaves both employers and the unemployed in need.

 That’s why any plan to mitigate the vacant property crisis must not only include innovative urban planning, but also try to restore employment opportunities. We need to literally build jobs on neglected and undeveloped land.

 There are a number of organizations in Philadelphia that provide models for dealing with vacancy and joblessness as intertwined problems. For example, the Job Opportunity Investment Network, a public-private partnership, supports workforce training programs that have a hyperlocal impact.

 One such program is the West Philadelphia Skills Initiative, which provides low-skill residents with intensive education and then matches graduates with jobs at the prestigious universities and medical centers within walking distance of their homes. While the jobs help people leave poverty behind, they ensure that the new wealth created remains in their neighborhoods, helping stabilize these downtrodden communities.

 Roots to Re-Entry enrolls convicts in a horticulture vocational and life-skills training program that, upon their release, leads to landscaping jobs. Part of the training includes growing organic food that is donated to Philadelphia’s neediest, showing how this work can nourish impoverished neighborhoods.

 Such programs can teach residents the skills they need to reimagine the urban voids they encounter every day. Cities, in turn, should partner with neighborhood groups to determine the most suitable abandoned buildings and lots for development, luring companies and projects that would employ newly retrained residents.

 Strategies that deal with vacant spaces by generating new paths to employment aim to do more than fixing broken windows ever could. They seek to change the dynamics of the local economy by creating better communities, not just prettier ones, where abandoned properties are viewed as job sites rather than crime scenes waiting to happen.

 Diana Lind is the editor at large of the magazine Next American City and a 2011 Van Alen Institute fellow.